200 thousand TL compensation penalty for the company that did not shoot the wedding video
Key Points
- The wedding footage of the couple in İzmir was never created because the cameraman did not press the record button.
- The İzmir Consumer Court ruled in favor of the couple, ordering the payment of a total of 200 thousand TL in non-pecuniary damages.
- The wedding venue prohibited bringing an outside camera and imposed its own cameraman.
- The lawyer stated that consumers who experience similar grievances should seek their legal rights.
By the Numbers
It was revealed that the agreed-upon cameraman did not record the wedding held in İzmir on December 27, 2023. The couple, who learned that the wedding venue imposed its own camera rules and did not allow outside filming, experienced great disappointment when they were left without any professional footage.
Upon the grievance experienced, the couple applied to the İzmir Consumer Court and filed a lawsuit for non-pecuniary damages. The court found the wedding venue at fault and ruled in favor of the couple. The decision, which ordered the payment of a total of 200 thousand TL in non-pecuniary damages, sets a precedent for similar grievances.
The couple's lawyer stated that many people who experienced similar situations provided feedback via social media but did not pursue the process of seeking their rights. The lawyer emphasized that consumers must definitely take such incidents to court, paying attention to statute of limitations periods.
React to this story
Ask about this story
Answers are AI-generated from this story only.
Frequently Asked Questions
- How much compensation was decided to be paid to the couple?
- The court decided that the couple should receive a total of 200 thousand TL in non-pecuniary damages, amounting to 100 thousand TL per person.
- Why were the wedding videos never recorded?
- No footage was created because the wedding venue's contracted cameraman walked around with the camera at the wedding but did not press the record button.
- Why is this court decision considered a precedent?
- Because it established a precedential legal ground for the compensation of the consumer's non-pecuniary damage in cases where a special day, which cannot be repeated, is not recorded.
This is an AI-generated summary. The full story lives at the source.
Read the full story at the sourcesivashaberler.com