Begoña Gómez submitted London flight tickets to the court and objected to the judge's request
要点
- 1. Begoña Gómez submitted the flight tickets for her trip to London for her daughter's graduation to Judge Peinado.
- 2. The defense objected to the request, stating that the United Kingdom does not physically stamp passports.
- 3. Judge Peinado asked Gómez to prove that the passport she was allowed to use to travel abroad last week was only used for the US.
数字で見る
Begoña Gómez, wife of Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, submitted the flight tickets for her travel last week to attend her daughter's graduation ceremony in London to Judge Juan Carlos Peinado, who is conducting the investigation. Gómez also objected to the judge's decision requesting her to prove the trip, citing the absence of entry-exit stamps on her passport.
Gómez's defense team stated that the United Kingdom does not physically stamp passports, describing the judge's request as 'diabolical evidence'. The defense stated that the judge asked Gómez to prove the absence of a criminal act that no one had proven. Furthermore, the defense invited the judge to apply directly to the British authorities to officially verify the entry-exit records.
Judge Peinado had requested Gómez to prove that the passport, which allowed her to leave Spain despite being seized on 20 June, was only used for the US trip. This new objection by Gómez shows that the legal process continues in the first-person investigation occupying Spanish politics.
リアクション
この記事について質問
回答はこの記事のみからAIが生成します。
よくある質問
- 1. What documents did Begoña Gómez submit to the judge?
- Gómez submitted to the court the flight tickets for her trip to attend her daughter's graduation ceremony in London last week.
- 2. Why did the judge ask Begoña Gómez for proof of travel?
- Because there were no entry or exit stamps belonging to the United Kingdom in Gómez's passport.
- 3. What kind of objection did the defense make against this request of the judge?
- The defense stated that the UK does not stamp physically and that the judge was asking them for unfair evidence, inviting the judge to apply to the British authorities.