コンテンツへ移動
Ravington
一覧に戻る
科学

Scientists suggest safer methods instead of thousands of animals for new pesticide tests

Ground Report
WhatsApp
Scientists suggest safer methods instead of thousands of animals for new pesticide tests
写真: groundreport.in

要点

  • Approximately 20,000 animals are killed in tests for every new agricultural pesticide released to the market.
  • India is the world's fourth-largest pesticide producer and third-largest exporter.
  • It is stated that traditional animal tests fail to predict the effects of chemicals on humans.
  • Many countries, including the USA, the EU, and South Korea, have committed to phasing out animal experiments.

数字で見る

20,000 animal lives2.83 billion dollars (2024)4.79 billion dollars (2033)Year 2017

It has been reported that the approval process for every new agricultural pesticide released to the market costs the lives of approximately 20,000 animals. The routine toxicity tests, conducted weekly, rely on old methods dating back to the 1950s and 1960s. Rats, rabbits, and dogs are exposed to chemicals to study the effects, and they are ultimately killed.

These tests, which have been criticized for many years, are stated to be unable to accurately predict the effects of chemicals on humans. It is emphasized that there are instances where the same test yields different results in different laboratories. Modern laboratories now have the capability to test chemicals directly on human cells or predict their effects using computer models.

Although India, the world's fourth-largest pesticide producer, has officially accepted some non-animal tests since 2017, animal testing continues to be the default method. Experts state that the biggest obstacle preventing companies from changing methods is the uncertainty regarding whether regulators will accept the new data.

リアクション

次の記事Chinese scientist researches extending reproductive lifespan with a three-month menstrual cycle

この記事について質問

回答はこの記事のみからAIが生成します。

よくある質問

Why are so many animals used for a new agricultural pesticide?
In traditional methods, tests are conducted on rats, rabbits, and dogs to determine the safe limits of the chemical on human health, and they are ultimately killed.
What methods do scientists suggest instead of these experiments?
Scientists recommend transitioning to contemporary methods that can predict the effects of chemicals, such as models using direct human cells and computer simulations.
What are the factors preventing companies from adopting these new methods?
Uncertainty about whether regulatory agencies will accept the data and the high cost of modern testing laboratory materials are the main obstacles for companies.

これはAIが生成した短い要約です。全文は出典にあります。

出典で全文を読むgroundreport.inコンテンツの作り方

関連記事