Power struggle within FETÖ: Post-coup split and expectation of 'amnesty'

Fethullah Gülen Terrorist Organization (FETÖ), which executed the July 15 coup attempt—one of the greatest traumas in the history of Turkey—and established a 'parallel state' structure within the state ranks for years, engaging in espionage activities, stands on the brink of a serious internal crisis following the death of its leader. The organization not only attempted a coup but also undermined Turkey's national security by sharing classified information with foreign intelligence services and possessed significant financial power for many years. With Gülen's passing and the collapse of hierarchical authority, different factions within the organization have turned against each other, initiating a violent internal conflict process to seize control.

The most striking aspect of this internal war is the decision of some wings of the organization to radically change their strategies. According to claims, a group within the organization wishing to change direction is demanding to be included in the scope of the 'Solution Process' and thus pardoned, by overlooking their past actions. This situation creates a stark contrast with the organization's historical structure and ideological stance, causing astonishment in political circles. Expectations regarding the association of the 'Solution Process' with FETÖ bring along a controversial ground both legally and politically.

On the other hand, at the forefront of the names at the center of these internal clashes are those accused of being the chief organizers of the July 15 coup attempt and listed high on the wanted list. These individuals are engaged in a fierce struggle with their rivals to maintain control of the organization and establish a new leadership structure. The authority vacuum caused by Gülen's death has disrupted the organization's traditional discipline and allowed different groups to promote their own agendas. The role of the most active figures in the coup attempt during this process provides important clues about how the future of the organization will take shape.

In light of these developments, the question of whether FETÖ still poses a serious security threat to our country has come back to the agenda. Whether the internal conflicts weaken the organization's capabilities or if it has radicalized further and planned new attacks is being meticulously followed by our intelligence units. The fact that a part of the organization has entered a search for political 'bargaining' can also be evaluated as a strategic deception by experts, reminding that the state's attitude towards terrorist organizations, to which it will not show tolerance, is clear. In order to preserve national unity and solidarity, it is stated that there is no acceptable aspect regarding such divisions and demands for amnesty.

Consequently, while FETÖ's current internal turmoil can be interpreted as an indicator of the success of the determined struggle conducted by our state, a warning is issued that the organization should not be considered completely finished. Although the fights that replaced the softened unity following Gülen's death further lower the organization's social legitimacy, it is clear that those sections hoping for help from sensitive political processes like the 'Solution Process' will be disappointed. Within the framework of the rule of law principles, the Republic of Turkey, the legacy of the July 15 martyrs, continues to be prepared against all kinds of traps and internal conflict scenarios.