要点
- Trump signed an executive order restricting mail-in ballots and demanded voter rolls from states.
- Judge Talwani ruled the order unconstitutional and issued two injunctions blocking the USPS from implementing it.
- Despite the court injunction, the USPS began building an untested system described by its own staff as a 'shit show.'
数字で見る
Donald Trump signed an executive order in 2026 seeking to have the USPS restrict mail-in ballots and have states turn over voter rolls to the federal government, citing allegations of mail-in ballot fraud. Over 20 states won lawsuits against this order, obtaining injunctions blocking its implementation.
Massachusetts Federal Judge Indira Talwani emphasized that the Constitution gives states the authority to run elections and that the federal government has no power to intervene in this area, ordering the USPS not to implement the order. The judge also noted that the federal government presented no evidence of mail-in ballot fraud.
Despite this, the USPS, without complying with the court injunction, began building an untested and undocumented ballot blocking system that its own personnel described as a "shit show." This situation is raising serious concerns about election security and judicial independence.
リアクション
この記事について質問
回答はこの記事のみからAIが生成します。
よくある質問
- What did Trump's executive order entail?
- It sought to have the USPS require states offering mail-in ballots to turn over voter rolls to the federal government and to create rules making mail-in voting more difficult.
- Why did the court issue an injunction?
- The court stated the Constitution gives states the authority to administer elections and the federal government has no power to intervene in this area.
- How did the USPS respond to the court injunction?
- It took no steps to comply with the injunction; on the contrary, it began developing an untested, undocumented ballot blocking system.
他の情報源での報道 · 1
- MSNBC·