要点
- The administrative appeal against the Preveza Municipal Council's land swap decision was rejected by the Central Administration.
- Public land worth 88,000 euros was swapped for private land worth 125,000 euros suitable for school construction.
- The decision was deemed legal on the grounds that the municipal land is not located within the coastal zone and serves the public interest.
- The appellants have the right to take the decision to a higher authority and apply again.
数字で見る
The month-long land swap dispute in the Mitika region of Greece's Preveza has been resolved. The Epirus - Western Macedonia Central Administration rejected the appeal made by council members and local residents against the Preveza Municipal Council decision. Thus, the way has been cleared for the municipality to finalize the procedure regarding the public land it swapped for private land to build a new school.
In the said swap, a public land worth approximately 88,000 euros, which is unsuitable for construction, is being exchanged for private land suitable for construction, worth 125,000 euros and owned by the Kotza brothers. This new land acquired by the municipality is planned to be used to construct a kindergarten building in the region. The appellants had claimed that the procedure did not serve the public interest and was not adopted by a sufficient majority.
The Central Administration stated that the decision was approved with 19 votes in the 29-member council and that this number is legally sufficient. In addition, it was determined that the land subject to the swap is not located within the coastal zone and is entirely included in the zoning plan. Although the appellants have the right to appeal the decision, the land swap and school construction steps can officially continue with the current process.
リアクション
この記事について質問
回答はこの記事のみからAIが生成します。
よくある質問
- What is the main purpose of the land swap in the Mitika region?
- The municipality aims to build a new kindergarten in the region by exchanging public land unsuitable for construction with usable private land.
- Why was the municipal council decision considered legally valid?
- It was determined that the decision, taken with 19 positive votes out of a total of 29 council members, met the legal majority requirements and that the land in question was suitable for the zoning plan.
- What will be the next legal step for those who oppose the land swap?
- The appellants have the right to file a new appeal application within one month before the Article 152 Special Committee located in Ioannina.