Bişevaç: Belgrade is trying to curry favor with Brussels to guarantee the legitimacy of the elections

Safeta Bişevaç, one of the leading figures in Serbian politics, explicitly stated that the primary aim of the government's stance in recent days and weeks is to curry favor with Brussels. She emphasized that this strategic move is aimed at preventing the international community from questioning the legitimacy of the upcoming elections. According to Bişevaç, the Belgrade administration is making a great effort to gain the support of the European Union, and this stands out as the clearest proof that the ruling party is in a tight position. The official stated that the government's opportunistic foreign policy is aimed at saving appearances rather than focusing on the country's internal dynamics. These statements once again reveal the political tension in Serbia and how fragile its relations with Europe are.

In recent months, the steps taken by Belgrade have been closely monitored in the regional and international arena. The Serbian administration is carrying out various diplomatic maneuvers in the process of normalizing and advancing relations with the European Union. At the forefront of these steps is the effort to win the favor of Brussels regarding the transparency of election processes and democratic standards. Bişevaç argues that during this process, the effort displayed by the ruling party is a pragmatic calculation aimed at suppressing potential crises that may arise on election day, rather than a matter of sincerity. It is observed that the Serbian government is trying to draw an image of a reliable ally in the eyes of EU officials. However, the opposition insists that these efforts are merely about saving the day rather than ensuring the country's genuine democratic transformation.

The upcoming elections are considered the biggest test of Serbia's democratic maturity and its determination on the European path. The legitimacy of the elections is among the main issues focused on by both the local opposition and international observers. According to Bişevaç's statements, if the elections to be held or concluded tomorrow are not considered legitimate by the international community, a major political crisis will be inevitable for the government. Therefore, Belgrade is conducting an intense lobbying effort with Brussels to suppress any criticism and to guarantee the election results. This situation demonstrates that the elections have ceased to be merely an internal political issue and have turned into a full-fledged diplomatic shootout.

Brussels' policy towards Serbia also carries great importance in this process. The European Union is closely monitoring Serbia to ensure stability in the Western Balkans and to keep the region within its sphere of influence. However, it remains a matter of curiosity how much the EU will tolerate the Belgrade administration's concessions regarding democratic standards and the rule of law. Bişevaç's criticisms actually indicate that Europe's foreign policy towards Serbia also needs to be questioned. If Brussels yields to the ruling party's efforts to curry favor, the weakening of democratic institutions in Serbia could accelerate. Consequently, the European Union's approach to the election processes stands out as one of the key factors that will determine Serbia's future political trajectory.

In summary, the statements made by Safeta Bişevaç reveal how complex and multidimensional the political climate in Serbia is. On one hand, there is a ruling party trying to consolidate the legitimacy of the elections, and on the other, an opposition emphasizing the insincerity of these efforts. Belgrade's hopeful efforts to curry favor with Brussels continue to disrupt the country's internal and external political balances. In the upcoming period, how the election results will be received and how the EU will intervene in this process is a matter of great curiosity. All these developments prove that Serbia's European integration process depends on more factors than just the ballot box. This diplomatic and internal political chess match in the political arena shows that the region is at a critical threshold regarding its future.