핵심 요약
- The first hearing of the school attack trial in Kahramanmaraş, which killed 10 people, was held.
- The attacker's father Uğur Mersinli defended that the weapons were stolen and his son was unaware of the plan.
- The father stated that authorities did not inform the family of his son's intent and that he felt deceived.
- It was claimed the indictment was prepared under public pressure and that the father had filed a theft complaint against his son.
숫자로 보기
The trial regarding the school attack in Kahramanmaraş that claimed the lives of 9 students and 1 teacher began at the Kahramanmaraş 3rd Heavy Penal Court. In the first hearing, the attacker İsa Aras Mersinli's father, Uğur Mersinli, rejected the claim that full responsibility for the incident lay with him and defended that the weapons were stolen from the home.
The father stated that his son was unaware of the attack plan, that parental fault was not applicable in this situation, and questioned why authorities did not share his son's intent with the family. He also expressed feeling deceived while taking his son to police training (the polygon).
Defendant father Uğur Mersinli continued his defense by stating the indictment was prepared under public pressure, that the sole perpetrator was his son, and that he was the complainant in a theft case against his son. The trial continues in the evidence collection phase.
반응 남기기
이 기사에 대해 질문
답변은 이 기사만을 바탕으로 AI가 생성합니다.
자주 묻는 질문
- How many people lost their lives in the Kahramanmaraş school attack?
- A total of 10 people died in the attack, including 9 students and 1 teacher.
- What did the attacker's father Uğur Mersinli defend in the hearing?
- He defended that the weapons were stolen from the home, his son was unaware of the attack plan, and authorities had not informed the family of this.
- What will be the next stage of the trial?
- The trial continues with the defendant father's defense; the court will enter the evidence collection and witness hearing process.