Forensic Medicine report in the Ahmet Çalık murder in Eskişehir: Defendant's criminal capacity is full

Ключевые моменты
- The Forensic Medicine Institution reported that the murder suspect Yalçın Namal is of sound mind and has full criminal capacity.
- The prosecutor demanded that the defendant be punished under TCK 81, the confiscation of the iron pipe, and the continuation of his detention.
- The family's lawyer stated that his client was brutally murdered and demanded that the act be evaluated under the heavier scope of TCK 82.
- The court accepted the time for the preparation of the defense and postponed the hearing to the date of 16 Temmuz 2026.
В цифрах
In the case regarding the brutal murder of Ahmet Çalık last year in the Çifteler district of Eskişehir, the report of the Forensic Medicine Institution was submitted to the court. The report stated that Yalçın Namal, who is being tried for murdering the victim by beating him with an iron bar after hitting him with his vehicle, is of sound mind and has full criminal capacity. While the prosecutor demanded that the defendant be punished within the scope of 'premeditated murder' (TCK 81), it was decided to continue his detention.
The defendant Yalçın Namal, who made his defense at the hearing, did not accept the charges and requested his acquittal and release. It was learned that in his previous statements, Namal claimed that he thought the victim was practicing witchcraft. The court panel gave the defendant's lawyer time to prepare his written defense and adjourned the hearing to 16 Temmuz 2026.
The lawyer of the victim's family objected to the prosecutor's opinion, arguing that the act should be evaluated within the scope of 'killing with monstrous feeling and by torture' (TCK 82). The lawyer stated that the vehicle was driven over Çalık repeatedly and no bones were left unbroken in his body, announcing that they would fight for the defendant to be punished with a heavier charge.
Ваша реакция
Спросить об этой новости
Ответы ИИ — только из этой новости.
Часто задаваемые вопросы
- How did the Ahmet Çalık murder take place?
- Allegedly, after hitting Ahmet Çalık with his car, Yalçın Namal got out of the vehicle and killed him by repeatedly beating him with an iron bar in his hand.
- What was the result of the Forensic Medicine Institution's report?
- The report stated that the defendant Yalçın Namal is of sound mind and has full criminal capacity, determining that there is no obstacle in terms of mental health.
- Are the opinions of the prosecutor and the victim's family's lawyer different?
- Yes, while the prosecutor argues that the act is 'premeditated murder' (TCK 81), the family's lawyer claims that the act is 'killing with monstrous feeling' (TCK 82) and demands a heavier penalty.
Это краткое резюме, созданное ИИ. Полный текст находится у источника.
Читать полностью у источникаeskisehirhaber.comЭта тема в других источниках · 1
- Hürriyet Kelebek·