Brazilian Congress expedites bill that will restrict Pantanal environmental protection area
要点
- The Brazilian Congress expedited a bill aimed at annulling Lula's decree expanding the environmental protection area in the Pantanal.
- The decree had increased the area of the Taiamã Ecological Station by 56,959 hectares, bringing it to a total of 68,502 hectares.
- Pro-Bolsonaro deputies claim that the decree creates a lack of legal certainty for farmers and fishers.
- The urgency request was accepted with 276 votes in favor and 139 votes against, determining the future of the bill.
数据一览
The Brazilian Chamber of Deputies approved an urgency request to expedite a bill aimed at annulling the Lula government's decree expanding an environmental protection area in the Pantanal, during an empty session. The bill, introduced by pro-Bolsonaro Deputy Coronel Fernanda, claims that the views of cattle ranchers and the local population in the region were not taken into account and that it creates legal uncertainty.
The Ministry of the Environment, which opposes the bill, stated that a comprehensive public consultation involving approximately 350 people and meetings with local fishing communities were held before the decree was published. The ministry emphasized that the expansion is of great importance to protect biodiversity and defend the ecosystem.
Despite this, the bill was placed on the agenda to be voted on directly in the plenary session of the Congress and was accepted by 276 votes in favor to 139 votes against. The passage of the bill caused divisions between ruling and opposition deputies, while discussions continue regarding the impacts of the issue on the environment and the local economy.
对这条新闻做出反应
询问这条新闻
回答由AI仅根据本新闻生成。
常见问题
- What exactly was the Lula government's decree aiming to do?
- The decree aimed to expand the protected area of the Taiamã Ecological Station in the Pantanal by 56,959 hectares, bringing it to a total of 68,502 hectares.
- Why are the deputies trying to annul this decree?
- The deputies who introduced the bill claim that the decree creates legal uncertainty and expropriation risks for farmers and fishers, arguing that the producers' views were not taken into account.
- What was the result of the vote in the Congress?
- The urgency request to expedite the consideration of the bill was accepted by 276 votes in favor to 139 votes against, and the bill was moved to the plenary session of the Congress.
其他来源的报道 · 4 · 2 个国家
- Diário do Centro do Mundo·
- Veja·
- Metrópoles·
- CartaCapital·