Ruling in favor of Uber and Lyft in New York: Law protecting drivers blocked by federal court
要点
- 1. Federal judge blocks New York local law protecting ride-hailing drivers from unfair system deactivations.
- 2. The law was halted on the grounds that it violates the companies' constitutional contract rights and threatens platform security.
- 3. The law, passed in December, aimed to protect approximately 87,000 drivers, the vast majority of whom are immigrants.
- 4. New York officials and local labor unions condemned the decision, arguing it favors the companies.
数据一览
A federal judge has halted the implementation of a New York law aimed at preventing ride-hailing companies like Uber and Lyft from suddenly deactivating their drivers. The decision is based on the grounds that the rule violates the companies' constitutional contract rights.
The law, approved last December and expected to protect about 87,000 drivers, was scheduled to go into effect on 28 July. The judge made the ruling by arguing that unjust deactivations affect only a small group of drivers and that the rule interferes with the companies' security policies.
The decision was sharply criticized by New York City Council members and the New York Taxi Workers Alliance. Critics stated that this situation harms efforts to defend workers' rights and gives companies the authority to police their platforms.
对这条新闻做出反应
询问这条新闻
回答由AI仅根据本新闻生成。
常见问题
- 1. Q: Why did the federal judge block the New York law?
- A: The judge concluded that the law violates Uber and Lyft's constitutional contract rights, interferes with their authority to ensure platform security, and that unjust deactivations affect a very small group.
- 2. Q: Who and what did the blocked law aim to protect?
- A: The law aimed to protect approximately 87,000 private ride-hailing drivers from being suddenly deactivated from the system without just cause and to provide them with due process rights.
- 3. Q: What does the law not going into effect mean for drivers?
- A: Since the protective measures preventing companies from making instant deactivations will not be applied temporarily, the winning companies will be able to continue their operations under their current rules.