Opposition in Thailand prepares for censure motion, government side maintains it holds power
要点
- Opposition leader Natthaphong Ruengpanyawut claimed that the government is unstable and nearing collapse.
- Former minister Thanakorn defended the government's strength, stating that all ministries are working harmoniously.
- Thanakorn expressed that the opposition should initiate a censure motion only if there is a serious issue, not just as a tradition.
Following the claim by Thailand's People's Party leader Natthaphong Ruengpanyawut that the government is unstable and could fall, a statement came from Bhumjaithai Party MP and former Industry Minister Thanakorn Wangboonkongchana. Thanakorn countered these claims, stating that the government led by Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul is working in harmony with all ministries.
Evaluating the opposition's announcement that they are waiting for the right time to bring a censure motion against the government, Thanakorn said that the opposition must first decide what to do within its own ranks. He emphasized that censure motions should not be held every year merely as a tradition or a tool to secure votes.
Thanakorn stated that if the opposition has genuine evidence of corruption, they can submit it to the government or through legal channels. In response to the prediction that the opposition's votes could bring down the government, he replied that the government's numbers are still solid.
对这条新闻做出反应
询问这条新闻
回答由AI仅根据本新闻生成。
常见问题
- What is the Thai opposition currently preparing to do?
- Opposition leader Natthaphong Ruengpanyawut announced that they plan to submit a censure motion against the government by waiting for the appropriate time.
- How did the government wing respond to the opposition's claims?
- Former minister Thanakorn stated that the government maintains its stability, works full-time, and that the opposition's votes will not be enough to bring down the government.
- What advice did Thanakorn give to the opposition?
- Thanakorn advised that censure motions should not be turned into an annual tradition and that legal oversight mechanisms should be used if there are serious doubts.