US President Donald Trump announced that he will request a new hearing against the Supreme Court's ruling that invalidated the executive order on birthright citizenship. On 30 Haziran 2026, the Court struck down Trump's initiative aimed at restricting automatic citizenship for children born on US soil to immigrant parents. In a statement from his social media account, the President strongly opposed the decision, emphasizing that the legal battle will continue. Trump also referred to the existence of advertisements and billboards suggesting that citizenship can be bought with money, describing the situation as unsustainable. Although it has not been confirmed whether an official application has been made by the authorities yet, the President's determination on this issue is drawing the attention of the entire country.
The Supreme Court reaffirmed a long-standing historical interpretation based on the 14th Amendment to the Amerika Birleşik Devletleri Constitution. This amendment grants automatic citizenship to almost all persons born within the borders of the US and subject to its jurisdiction. The majority opinion of the Court was written by Chief Justice John Roberts, and the decision demonstrates that the legal framework must be clearly preserved. The Trump administration had previously claimed that the executive order was fully compliant with the Constitution and immigration laws. However, both lower courts and the Supreme Court clearly rejected the administration's interpretation, maintaining the validity of current legal regulations.
This recent decision by the Supreme Court has also strengthened long-standing precedents such as the 'United States v. Wong Kim Ark' case seen in 1898. Historical precedent cases confirm that the 'jus soli', or birthright citizenship rule, is broadly applied regardless of the immigration status of the child's parents. The Trump administration's executive order targeted children of undocumented immigrants or those with temporary status, aiming to make a fundamental change in the citizenship policies that the country has implemented for over a century. However, the annulment of this initiative by the court is considered a highly critical turning point in terms of protecting Constitutional rights. Legal experts state that with this decision by the Supreme Court, the matter is largely closed and the right to citizenship independent of parents' status is guaranteed.
According to court procedures, Rule 44 of the Supreme Court requires that an application for the reconsideration of a decision be made within 25 days at the latest from the date of the decision. In order for such a request for reconsideration to be accepted, at least one justice who was part of the majority in the original decision must provide support. However, it is extremely rare for such applications to be accepted by the Supreme Court. Currently, there is no definitive information that an official application has been made or that any justice has provided support on this matter. Nevertheless, President Trump's public statements indicate that preparations have begun for a possible new hearing process.
Following these developments, it is seen that this legal and political struggle has sparked a deep debate in the Amerika Birleşik Devletleri in the context of immigration policies and Constitutional rights. The Trump administration stated that they will insist on requesting a new hearing after the decision, planning to push the process to the end. The issue of immigration continues to be a polarizing topic in US politics, and the questioning of the basic rules of citizenship has caused widespread outrage in the country. Politicians with opposing views and civil society organizations have seen the Supreme Court's decision as a great victory for the protection of citizenship as a fundamental right. It is expected that possible applications to be made in the upcoming period and the final response from the Supreme Court will play a decisive role in the demographic and legal future of the country.
询问这条新闻
回答由AI仅根据本新闻生成。